Etd
Personality factors and spiritual styles: is there a relationship?
Public Deposited![Default work thumbnail](/assets/default-a3b75da7abded620ab321410c80d102e5e2417b71c54de7ba7d4b0363da904f7.png)
MLA citation style (9th ed.)
Columbia Theological Seminary. rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/929da0b9-807f-47f3-893c-43c8f31f537d. Personality Factors and Spiritual Styles: Is There a Relationship?.APA citation style (7th ed.)
Personality factors and spiritual styles: is there a relationship?. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/929da0b9-807f-47f3-893c-43c8f31f537dChicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)
Personality Factors and Spiritual Styles: Is There a Relationship?. Columbia Theological Seminary. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/929da0b9-807f-47f3-893c-43c8f31f537d.Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.
- Creator
- Rights Statement
- Abstract
- This thesis is a response to the increased utilization of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). It suggests that the MBTI is not a highly regarded instrument psychometrically. Further that much of the methodology currently employed is largely based upon influence and impression. Lastly, the Jungian personality theory and method may not be the most desirable theoretical base for correlational studies. My alternative seeks to observe and quantify purported relationships. It employs a personality theory based upon factor analysis and the Sixteen Personality Questionnaire (16PF) as a preferred psychometric instrument. This dissertation is largely a response to earlier work done by Michael and Norrisey. It is a critique of Jungian typology and the MBTI. I propose a more empirically-based theory, method, and psychometric instrument.
- Publisher
- Year
- Subject
- Language
- Resource Type
- Type
- Degree
- Degree Granting Institution
- Advisor
- Host Institution
- Last modified
- 02/17/2024
Relations
Items
There are no publicly available items in this work.