Can You Hear Me Now? Effective Preaching In A Post-Church Culture

Randall Dean Ahlberg

Etd

Can You Hear Me Now? Effective Preaching In A Post-Church Culture

Public Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Randall Dean Ahlberg. Can You Hear Me Now? Effective Preaching In A Post-church Culture. rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/adcb55ad-e452-45b1-b899-ab1570cb6467.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

R. D. Ahlberg. Can You Hear Me Now? Effective Preaching In A Post-Church Culture. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/adcb55ad-e452-45b1-b899-ab1570cb6467

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Randall Dean Ahlberg. Can You Hear Me Now? Effective Preaching In A Post-Church Culture. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/adcb55ad-e452-45b1-b899-ab1570cb6467.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Creator

Randall Dean Ahlberg

Keyword

Communication (Theology)

Rights Statement

In Copyright

License

Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International

Abstract

This project addressed the need for preaching principles that more effectively communicate to those living in the realities of our current cultural. In examining the sermons of the apostle Paul, it was evident that he significantly contextualized his message to his various audiences, demonstrating for all preachers the need to engage in not only good exegesis of the text but in good exegesis of the audience. The researcher attempted to gain a better understanding of the culture of the community surrounding his church in Andover, Minnesota and ways to communicate clearly to this culture. The primary tool used was a survey conducted at a community festival on church property. The survey was designed to measure the level of biblical knowledge of the participants and also to investigate the relationship between church attendance and the demonstrated levels of biblical knowledge. The assumption of the researcher was that preachers often assume their congregations know more than they do, and this assumption was proven to hold merit. Finally, in assessing the above information, a set of homiletical principles were developed that embrace both a commitment to biblical preaching and an awareness of the realities of post-church American culture. One of the conclusions of the author is that a neglected aspect of homiletics is our need to wrestle through the striking differences between oral and written communication styles. The preacher’s preparation must keep these dynamics in mind if he/she hopes to communicate the timeless truths of the Bible to a time-bound audience.

Year