The TITIP program in Papua, Indonesia: an assessment

Margreet H Kroneman

Etd

The TITIP program in Papua, Indonesia: an assessment

Público Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Margreet H Kroneman. The Titip Program In Papua, Indonesia: an Assessment. Columbia Biblical Seminary and School of Missions. rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/f267060f-f9bd-4a4e-822e-931c1806cf33?locale=es.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

M. H. Kroneman. The TITIP program in Papua, Indonesia: an assessment. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/f267060f-f9bd-4a4e-822e-931c1806cf33?locale=es

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Margreet H Kroneman. The Titip Program In Papua, Indonesia: an Assessment. Columbia Biblical Seminary and School of Missions. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/f267060f-f9bd-4a4e-822e-931c1806cf33?locale=es.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Creador

Margreet H Kroneman

Declaración de derechos

In Copyright

Abstracto

This study describes and analyzes a Christian English language program, and assesses the factors that influence its effectiveness in training young Papuans in English, spiritual formation and leadership. The result of the research is that TITIP is a promising and effective program that achieves most of its objectives and in general adheres to good principles of teaching.The strength of the program lies especially in its spiritual formation and in its teaching of English. Factors that make the program effective include: native speakers of English as teachers, a student-oriented and interactive teaching style, dormitory living, staff are good models of Christian maturity and servant leadership, the practice of a variety of spiritual disciplines, punctuality, and critical thinking skills. The main concern about the TITIP program is that while providing a holistic training program there seems to be a lack of focus. The two objectives of TITIP are to prepare young Papuans for advanced study domestically and abroad, and at the same time to provide opportunities for preparing them to be 'change agents' and leaders in their own Papuan communities. There is a possible tension between these two objectives and the training emphasis that is needed for each of these.

Editor