Making connections: a relational reframing of object relations theory for pastoral psychotherapy with women having intimate relationship problems

Diana C Leaf

Etd

Making connections: a relational reframing of object relations theory for pastoral psychotherapy with women having intimate relationship problems

Público Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Diana C Leaf. Making Connections: a Relational Reframing of Object Relations Theory for Pastoral Psychotherapy with Women Having Intimate Relationship Problems. Phillips Theological Seminary. rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/004fbd96-48e9-4f5c-be46-bb6c643a3e9a?locale=pt-BR.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

D. C. Leaf. Making connections: a relational reframing of object relations theory for pastoral psychotherapy with women having intimate relationship problems. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/004fbd96-48e9-4f5c-be46-bb6c643a3e9a?locale=pt-BR

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Diana C Leaf. Making Connections: a Relational Reframing of Object Relations Theory for Pastoral Psychotherapy with Women Having Intimate Relationship Problems. Phillips Theological Seminary. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/004fbd96-48e9-4f5c-be46-bb6c643a3e9a?locale=pt-BR.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

O Criador

Diana C Leaf

Palavra-chave

Pastoral counselors and clients

Declaração de Direitos

In Copyright

Abstrato

This project proposes a relationally-reframed object relations approach for pastoral psychotherapy with women having intimate relationship problems. It posits the paradox that people yearn for relationships (connections) with others yet keep themselves out of relationship (disconnected) because of hurtful past experiences. Case presentations show how key concepts of object relations theory--transference, countertransference, the unconscious, and resistance--can be reframed in a relational context to enable authentic and growth-fostering connections for both client and therapist. The theological correlation of this therapeutic approach, especially concerning themes of alienation and sin, isolation and suffering, are examined using a feminist critique.

Editor