The evaluation of the pastoral leader in the context of the congregation

Ralph A Lebold

Etd

The evaluation of the pastoral leader in the context of the congregation

Público Deposited

MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Ralph A Lebold. The Evaluation of the Pastoral Leader In the Context of the Congregation. University of St. Michael's College Faculty of Theology. rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/93a18292-57d5-494a-bf4a-af8c369d6ffa?locale=es.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

R. A. Lebold. The evaluation of the pastoral leader in the context of the congregation. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/93a18292-57d5-494a-bf4a-af8c369d6ffa?locale=es

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Ralph A Lebold. The Evaluation of the Pastoral Leader In the Context of the Congregation. University of St. Michael's College Faculty of Theology. https://rim.ir.atla.com/concern/etds/93a18292-57d5-494a-bf4a-af8c369d6ffa?locale=es.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

Creador

Ralph A Lebold

Declaración de derechos

In Copyright

Abstracto

The evaluation of leaders occurs whether it is called for or not. Leadership is judged, consciously or unconsciously, by the persons who experience it. It is the view of the writer that evaluations ought to be planned to maximize learning and growth. The process of disciplined reflection is rooted in church history and is modelled in the biblical story. Such a process can be a creative avenue for growth and change. These experiences need not be feared nor do they need to be destructive. It is possible to teach groups and individuals how to evaluate people and programs constructively. The action research project attempts to illustrate, through the avenue of ministry, a process for evaluating pastoral leaders in the context of the congregation. Fifteen Mennonite pastors volunteered to participate in an evaluation with their congregations. Four types of evaluations were designed and tested. The results are described and evaluated. The text included a statement outlining the conceptual basis for evaluation. Results reinforce the thesis that evaluations can have a positive effect for the pastor and the congregation. Limitations and potential dangers are also noted.

Editor